From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Truesdale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1992
186 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 27, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bonnie Wittner, J.).


The trial testimony of the People's witnesses that defendant threatened the complainant over the telephone, went looking for her in her neighborhood, and, upon confronting her, repeatedly struck at her face with a sharp object, a box cutter, resulting in the bleeding to her face and to her arm when she tried to shield her face, is clearly sufficient, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), to show that defendant acted with the requisite intent to cause serious and permanent disfigurement to complainant under Penal Law § 120.10 (2).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Truesdale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1992
186 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Truesdale

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELIZABETH TRUESDALE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 322

Citing Cases

The People v. Mateo

As defendant correctly concedes, the People presented legally sufficient evidence establishing that his pit…

Sullivan v. Superintendent

See People v. Askernee, 683 N.Y.S.2d 200, 201 (1st Dep't 1998) ("defendant brought to the encounter a solid…