From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Towers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 19, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On July 11, 1988, the defendant and codefendant approached three different women in two shopping centers located in Nassau County and attempted to steal their automobiles and personal property. The defendant fled the scene but, after pursuit, was apprehended by the Nassau County Police in Queens County. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the discretionary imposition of consecutive sentences was appropriate under the circumstances. The offenses constitute separate and distinct acts, distinguishable by time, place, and victim (see, Penal Law § 70.25; People v Gilliam, 112 A.D.2d 475; see also, People v Boyce, 133 A.D.2d 164).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lemon, 62 N.Y.2d 745, 746) and, in any event, is without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Towers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Towers

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT TOWERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
566 N.Y.S.2d 400

Citing Cases

People v. White

There are no exceptional circumstances here warranting modification of the sentence. The sentence imposed in…

People v. White

There are no exceptional circumstances here warranting modification of the sentence. The sentence imposed in…