Opinion
Submitted April 29, 1999
June 14, 1999
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered February 7, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Steven R. Bernhard of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie, Victor Barall, and Brendan Fitzgerald Crowe of counsel), for respondent.
DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was convicted of various crimes arising from an incident wherein he stabbed his estranged wife seven times with an ice pick and stole various items, including the wife's green card and food stamps. The husband did not deny that he stabbed the wife. Rather, his defense was that the stabbing was in self-defense after the wife threatened him with a knife and bit his hand.
Contrary to the defendant's arguments on appeal, the court did not err in permitting the People to question the wife concerning two prior incidents wherein she was assaulted by the defendant ( see, People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233). Indeed, the defendant does not dispute that such evidence was probative of his intent herein, but rather only that the prejudicial effect of such evidence outweighed its probative value ( see, People v. Hudy, 73 N.Y.2d 40; People v. Alvino, supra). However, on the facts presented, including, inter alia, the defendant's argument as to self-defense, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in balancing the competing considerations and permitting the evidence ( see, People v. Hawker, 215 A.D.2d 499). Moreover, the court issued proper limiting instructions concerning such evidence ( see, People v. Foster, 211 A.D.2d 640; People v. Randall, 177 A.D.2d 661).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.