From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Topsy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 17, 1999

October 4, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant possessed an unlicensed, loaded firearm. The jury was entitled to presume that the defendant intended to use it unlawfully (see, Penal Law § 265.15; People v. Higdon, 162 A.D.2d 957, 958; People v. Carrion, 136 A.D.2d 649, 650).

There is no merit to the defendant's claims of prosecutorial misconduct during the cross-examination of the defendant and during closing argument (see, People v. Whyte, 228 A.D.2d 395, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 868, cert denied 525 U.S. 1125).

S. MILLER, J.P., SANTUCCI, SULLIVAN, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Topsy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Topsy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RICARDO TOPSY, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 470

Citing Cases

State v. Kowalewski

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by directing that the term of imprisonment imposed on the…

People v. McCrae

In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60…