From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Toporczyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 26, 1991
178 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 26, 1991

Appeal from the Genesee County Court, Morton, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Doerr, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: There must be a reversal of defendant's conviction because he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The relationship between the victim and defendant prior to the alleged criminal acts raises questions about the victim's credibility, and the proof at trial was not overwhelming. Counsel's failure to request a bill of particulars; failure to object to irrelevant testimony regarding uncharged criminal acts and immoral conduct; and failure to object to the improper cross-examination of reputation witnesses, taken together, served to undermine the defendant's case substantially and cannot be explained as attempts to employ legitimate trial tactics (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). We do not address the other arguments raised by defendant because he should have a new trial.


Summaries of

People v. Toporczyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 26, 1991
178 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Toporczyk

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK TOPORCZYK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 26, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
578 N.Y.S.2d 742

Citing Cases

People v. Claitt

Finally, although counsel should have insisted that the People comply with his demand for a bill of…