From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tobar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 21, 2012
92 A.D.3d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-21

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lorenzo J. TOBAR, appellant.

Langone & Associates, PLLC, Levittown, N.Y. (Richard M. Langone of counsel), for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Joanna Hershey and Courtney Weinberger of counsel; Jeffrey Bloomfield on the brief), for respondent.


Langone & Associates, PLLC, Levittown, N.Y. (Richard M. Langone of counsel), for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Joanna Hershey and Courtney Weinberger of counsel; Jeffrey Bloomfield on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kase, J.), rendered April 29, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered ( see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646; People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909, 910–911, 563 N.Y.S.2d 43, 564 N.E.2d 653; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687, cert. denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067, 89 S.Ct. 721, 21 L.Ed.2d 709). The Supreme Court properly conducted the plea allocution ( see People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d at 353, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687).

The defendant was provided with the effective assistance of counsel ( see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674; People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584). The defendant's unsubstantiated claims of coercion and dissatisfaction with the representation by his counsel, which were refuted by his statements during the plea allocution, do not warrant a hearing ( see generally People v. Massey, 70 A.D.3d 722, 892 N.Y.S.2d 888; People v. Hughes, 62 A.D.3d 1026, 878 N.Y.S.2d 911).

RIVERA, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, LEVENTHAL and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tobar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 21, 2012
92 A.D.3d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Tobar

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lorenzo J. TOBAR, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 21, 2012

Citations

92 A.D.3d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1490
938 N.Y.S.2d 819

Citing Cases

People v. Pelaez

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw…