From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1991
169 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 15, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Vincent Quattrochi, J.).


The record amply demonstrates that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered his guilty plea. (People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9.) Thereafter, in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea on the grounds that he was confused and intoxicated by methadone at the time it was entered, the trial court made appropriate inquiry, allowed full opportunity for comment by defendant and his counsel, and properly exercised its discretion in summarily denying defendant's motion without a hearing (People v Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1991
169 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM THOMPSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
564 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

People v. Torra

The conflicting evidence adduced at the discretionary hearing afforded defendant on his motion to withdraw…

Cameron v. State

Upon exhaustive research, we have found no cases in Maryland or in other jurisdictions that presume that a…