From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1998
246 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

January 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J., at plea; Gerald Sheindlin, J., at sentence).


Defendant's challenges to his enhanced sentence are unpreserved and, in any event, without merit. The court properly imposed a sentence greater than that originally promised since defendant violated the conditions of the plea agreement ( see, People v. Berdecia, 223 A.D.2d 444, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 1019; People v. Dremeguila, 166 A.D.2d 196, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 1020). Furthermore, the sentencing court was entitled to enhance defendant's sentence without first giving him an opportunity to withdraw his plea ( see, People v. Murello, 39 N.Y.2d 879). We do not perceive the enhancement of the sentence to be an abuse of discretion or the sentence itself to be unduly harsh.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1998
246 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIZLON THOMPSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 6, 1998

Citations

246 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 243

Citing Cases

People v. Schaeffer

The court clearly warned defendant that a violation of the prior orders of protection would be a violation of…

People v. Sanchez

Were we to review them, we would find them to be without merit. The court properly withdrew its promise of…