From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 30, 1994

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Egan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Fallon, Wesley and Doerr, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court erred in permitting the People to cross-examine defendant regarding his uncharged use of cocaine without conducting a Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v. Ventimiglia, 52 N.Y.2d 350; People v. Holloway, 185 A.D.2d 646, 647, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 1027). In light of the overwhelming proof of defendant's guilt, however, that error was harmless (see, People v. Myers, 185 A.D.2d 695; People v. Holloway, supra).

Finally, defendant's sentence is not harsh or excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES THOMAS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 107

Citing Cases

People v. Watkins

We conclude that the court's failure to conduct a Ventimiglia hearing was error, but that the error is…

People v. Furtick

Defendant also contends that the court erred in permitting a prosecution witness to testify concerning…