From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 5, 1954
283 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

May 5, 1954.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.


Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: During the charge to the jury, the court referred on several occasions to the statements given by appellant as confessions. A reading of those statements indicates that they were in no sense an admission by appellant of the crime of burglary, third degree. We feel that the characterization of such statements as confessions constituted error which deprived appellant of a fair and impartial trial. (See People v. Doria, 281 App. Div. 918.) All concur.


Summaries of

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 5, 1954
283 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

People v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LIONEL E. THOMAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 5, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

People v. Lee

It was improper for the district attorney to state in summation that he knew appellant was lying ( People v.…

People v. Greenwaldt

If you decide to consider the statements of the defendant as a confession based on the law as I have…