From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thomas

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Apr 14, 2021
193 A.D.3d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2019–03608 Ind. No. 2093/18

04-14-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Darryl THOMAS, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill, Roni C. Piplani, and Antara D. Kanth of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill, Roni C. Piplani, and Antara D. Kanth of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leslie G. Leach, J.), rendered February 25, 2019, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he validly waived his right to appeal (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 ; People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Carryl, 169 A.D.3d 818, 93 N.Y.S.3d 703 ). Nonetheless, the defendant's contentions that an order of protection should be vacated because the Supreme Court failed to articulate on the record its reasons for issuing the order of protection as required by CPL 530.13(4), and that the court erred in setting the duration of the order, survive his appeal waiver (see People v. Guidice, 183 A.D.3d 913, 122 N.Y.S.3d 916 ; People v. Carryl, 169 A.D.3d at 820, 93 N.Y.S.3d 703 ; People v. Appiarius, 160 A.D.3d 889, 73 N.Y.S.3d 899 ). However, those contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d 310, 316–317, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13 ; People v. DeRobertis, 191 A.D.3d 898, 138 N.Y.S.3d 919 ). The defendant failed to raise these issues at sentencing or move to amend the order of protection on these grounds, and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v. Nicholson, 190 A.D.3d 768, 769, 135 N.Y.S.3d 853 ; People v. Colon, 187 A.D.3d 780, 130 N.Y.S.3d 344 ; People v. Rodriguez, 157 A.D.3d 971, 67 N.Y.S.3d 485 ).

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Thomas

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Apr 14, 2021
193 A.D.3d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Darryl Thomas…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Apr 14, 2021

Citations

193 A.D.3d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 2322
142 N.Y.S.3d 390

Citing Cases

People v. Tumolo

As to Indictment No. 993–17, we find that the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily,…

People v. Tumolo

As to Indictment No. 993-17, we find that the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily,…