From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Terrill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2005
17 A.D.3d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 04-02922.

April 29, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), dated April 19, 2004. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

BIANCO LAW OFFICE, SYRACUSE (RANDI J. BIANCO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (VICTORIA M. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved, and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We agree with defendant that County Court failed to set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which its determination was based ( see § 168-n [3]). Absent those findings and conclusions, we are unable to review whether the court properly determined defendant's risk level. We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Onondaga County Court for compliance with the statute ( see People v. Hoppe, 1 AD3d 712, 713).


Summaries of

People v. Terrill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2005
17 A.D.3d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Terrill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GORDON A. TERRILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 29, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 782

Citing Cases

State v. Millar

On the record before us, we are unable to review whether the court properly determined defendant's risk…

People v. Long

"[T]he failure of the court to set forth [those] findings of fact and conclusions of law . . .'precludle[s]…