From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Teribury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 1993
191 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 11, 1993

Appeal from the County Court of Tioga County (Siedlecki, J.).


Defendant was charged in a four-count indictment with criminal possession of more than a pound of marihuana and illegal possession of four pistols and 13 blasting caps. Pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain he pleaded guilty to one count in satisfaction of the indictment and was fined and received a sentence of probation. Defendant has appealed.

Defendant contends that the search warrant was invalid and that the evidence seized thereunder should have been suppressed. However, because defendant pleaded guilty prior to a suppression hearing, he has waived his right to appellate review of that issue (see, People v. Carty, 173 A.D.2d 900, 901, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1074). Defendant's guilty plea not only constituted an actual waiver of his right to challenge the refusal to suppress any evidence seized through the challenged search warrant, but also operates as a forfeiture of the right to review his arguments made before the plea (see, People v. Taylor, 65 N.Y.2d 1, 5). We have examined the remainder of defendant's contentions and conclude that they are without merit.

Yesawich Jr., Levine, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Teribury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 1993
191 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Teribury

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDERICK L. TERIBURY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 696