From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Teague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1988
145 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

December 23, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the court erred in admitting two store receipts as evidence of the value of a stolen VCR and television. Because no foundation was laid by a qualified custodian to establish that these receipts were made in the ordinary course of business, this evidence constituted inadmissible hearsay (People v Kennedy, 68 N.Y.2d 569; 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 4518.18). In light of the other overwhelming evidence of value, the admission of these documents was harmless because no significant probability existed that the verdict would have been different but for this error (People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Teague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1988
145 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Teague

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL TEAGUE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1988

Citations

145 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Allison

"Because no foundation was laid by a qualified custodian to establish that these receipts were made in the…