From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1993
190 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.).


At approximately 6:00 A.M., a security guard, via a television monitor, observed defendant sitting at the receptionist's desk on the 20th floor of the McGraw-Hill building attempting to unlock a desk drawer. That guard and another repaired to the 20th floor and asked defendant what he was doing. Defendant replied that he was looking for a job. Upon being escorted to the security office, defendant threw a screwdriver towards the freight elevator. The security supervisor called the police and defendant was arrested.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People and giving due deference to the trial court's findings of credibility (People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), defendant's guilt of burglary in the third degree was supported by the evidence. The evidence indicates that the building was not open to the public. All entrances, with one exception, were locked and displayed "closed" signs. Further, two security guards were standing near the lobby entrance at the security desk equipped with a register for visitors to sign. In addition, there were rope partitions directing visitors to the register and there was a sign instructing them to produce proper identification in order to gain entrance. Thus, it is reasonable to infer from these circumstances that defendant was aware that he entered the building unlawfully. Also, defendant's attempt to unlock the desk drawers, the early morning hour, and his presence in an "area off-limits to persons otherwise allowed to be in the * * * area" (People v Lloyd, 180 A.D.2d 527, 527-528, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 1003), support the inference that he intended to commit a crime at the time he entered the building.

Defendant's guilt of possession of burglar's tools was also proved beyond a reasonable doubt, by circumstantial evidence. A screwdriver can be considered a burglar's tool and circumstantial evidence can be used to establish the requisite intent to use it in the commission of an offense involving forcible entry (see, People v Atson, 139 A.D.2d 520, 521, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 856). Here, defendant was observed attempting to unlock a desk drawer at 6:00 A.M. in an area to which he had no proper access. When apprehended, he discarded the screwdriver, evincing consciousness of guilt (see, People v Barnes, 50 N.Y.2d 375, 381).

We have considered defendant's other claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1993
190 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JIMMIE TAYLOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Citing Cases

People v. Pantoja

The quoted facts, even when taken together with all reasonable inferences which can be drawn from those facts…

People v. Monero

Instead, the People must prove facts that provide circumstantial evidence of such intent. (See, e.g., People…