From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tappin [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 1999
695 N.Y.S.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 1, 1999

August 16, 1999

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Kimberlianne Podlas of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Rhea A. Grob of counsel), for respondent.

MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), rendered November 10, 1997, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and bail jumping in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that he was denied a fundamental right to be present at all material stages of the trial by his exclusion from sidebar discussions during voir dire ( see, People v. Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247; People v. People, 223 A.D.2d 732). The defendant, after discussing the matter with his attorney, signed a waiver stating that he was advised of his rights and agreed to waive his right to be present at sidebar discussions during voir dire. Therefore, the waiver was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given ( see, People v. Varga, 88 N.Y.2d 363; People v. McGee, 208 A.D.2d 388).

ALTMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tappin [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 1999
695 N.Y.S.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Tappin [2d Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:The People, etc., respondent, v. Ralph Tappin, a/k/a Ronald Innis…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 16, 1999

Citations

695 N.Y.S.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)