From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tambriz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2018
162 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–00807

06-13-2018

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Guillermo TAMBRIZ, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Ellen Dille of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Masha Simonova on the brief), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Ellen Dille of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Masha Simonova on the brief), for respondent.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, SANDRA L. SGROI, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miriam Cyrulnik, J.), dated December 15, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this proceeding under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168 et seq. ), the defendant challenges the assessment of 20 points under risk factor 3 of the risk assessment instrument (number of victims). We find no basis to overturn the Supreme Court's assessment of points under this risk factor. The evidence at the hearing, which included, among other things, the felony complaint and the presentence report, constituted clear and convincing evidence that there were two victims (see People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 572, 883 N.Y.S.2d 154, 910 N.E.2d 983 ; People v. Alas, 140 A.D.3d 841, 841, 35 N.Y.S.3d 112 ; People v. Arocho, 130 A.D.3d 996, 997, 13 N.Y.S.3d 836 ; People v. DeJesus, 127 A.D.3d 1047, 1047, 5 N.Y.S.3d 893 ; People v. Patronick, 117 A.D.3d 1018, 1019, 986 N.Y.S.2d 593 ; People v. Dash, 111 A.D.3d 907, 908, 977 N.Y.S.2d 39 ). Since the assessment of a total of 80 points on the risk assessment instrument was appropriate, we agree with the court's designation of the defendant as a level two sex offender.

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tambriz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 13, 2018
162 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Tambriz

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Guillermo TAMBRIZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 13, 2018

Citations

162 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 4364
74 N.Y.S.3d 884