Opinion
July 21, 1986
Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.).
Judgment affirmed. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
A review of the evidence, the law and the circumstances of the instant case reveals that meaningful representation was provided to the defendant and that his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel was satisfied (see, People v Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796; People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).
The defendant's contention regarding the jury charge on the presumptions contained in Penal Law § 165.55 (1) and (2) has not been preserved for our review (see, People v Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467; People v McClain, 107 A.D.2d 765), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
We also decline to disturb the sentence. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.