From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tabachnik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1987
131 A.D.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

June 8, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County, Dunkin, J., Zelman, J.


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to prove that the complainant suffered "physical injury" within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) and § 120.00 (1). The complainant testified that as a result of being kicked in the thigh by the defendant, his upper thigh "was very sore * * * it hurt, it stung". That night, his groin area felt very sore, and was "very black and blue". However, two days later, the groin area only felt sore if the complainant pressed it. There is no evidence that the complainant experienced any pain beyond two days after the incident. The pain about which the complainant testified did not reach the objective level required to be considered substantial (see, Matter of Philip A., 49 N.Y.2d 198; People v Goins, 129 A.D.2d 733). Moreover, no evidence was adduced that the complainant suffered any impairment of physical condition. Consequently, the judgment of conviction must be reversed. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tabachnik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1987
131 A.D.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Tabachnik

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEONARD TABACHNIK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1987

Citations

131 A.D.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Suluvan

"Physical injury means `impairment of physical condition or substantial pain.' (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]). It…

People v. Smith

The Third Department has accepted testimony much less descriptive in finding substantial pain, holding that…