From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sweeper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 13, 1990
165 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.).


Complainant was robbed by several persons in front of the Prince George Hotel. A week later, the complainant returned with the police and identified the defendant and three others. The defendants were brought back to the precinct where the complainant again identified them. The complainant's in-court identification of defendant did not require an independent source because of the station house showup. "It was not an improper police-arranged showup at the precinct serving as an initial identification, the unreliability of which is well established", but a confirmatory identification. (People v. Nixon, 162 A.D.2d 225. )

Defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, meritless or constitute harmless error.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Sweeper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 13, 1990
165 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Sweeper

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK SWEEPER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 13, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Ptah

Although conceding that the street showup must be precluded, the prosecutor urges that the properly noticed…

People v. Mato

However, after the officers arrested the occupants of the apartment following the second sale, they also…