From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sutter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 1, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (William H. Wallace, III, J.).


Defendant's contention that the factual recitation of his plea was deficient is not preserved for appellate review (People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662), and we decline to reach it. If we were to reach the issue in the interest of justice, we would find that defendant's allocution, taken as a whole, raised no significant doubts concerning his intent to rob the victim. In any event, the record shows that the plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily with the assistance of competent counsel (People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 19), and that defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions to the court in his oral representations and pro se motion to withdraw the plea (see, People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524-525).

We have considered defendant's remaining claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Sutter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Sutter

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HOWARD SUTTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Lee

Defendant's latter claim, while preserved, is also without merit inasmuch as defendant's claims of coercion…