From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Suber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1977
58 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

June 2, 1977


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County, rendered November 5, 1976, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. The only issue raised on this appeal is defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh and excessive. His guilty plea was entered with knowledge of the sentence to be imposed and in full satisfaction of other charges pending against him. Moreover, he had previously been convicted of a drug-related offense. We are unable to say that, on this record, an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment with a maximum of nine years and a minimum of three years was excessive or represented an abuse of discretion (People v Caputo, 13 A.D.2d 861). Judgment affirmed. Koreman P.J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Suber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1977
58 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Suber

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE SUBER, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

People v. Griffin

Given defendant's history and circumstances, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Colon, 91…