From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2009
59 A.D.3d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

February 24, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnick, J.), rendered July 26, 2005, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Balkin and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for an adjournment to retain new counsel, made on the day of trial ( see People v Linares, 2 NY3d 507; People v Davis, 299 AD2d 420, 421; People v Gloster, 175 AD2d 258, 259-260).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v Hepp, 40 AD3d 880, 881). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).


Summaries of

People v. Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2009
59 A.D.3d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Street

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TERRY STREET, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
873 N.Y.S.2d 495

Citing Cases

People v. Makropoulos

Here, the defendant's request for an adjournment was made at the time that the scheduled suppression hearing…

People v. Makropoulos

Here, the defendant's request for an adjournment was made at the time that the scheduled suppression hearing…