Opinion
May 30, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's argument on appeal, while the trial court's charge contained certain language which was unbalanced and is not condoned by this court, the language in question did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial, particularly in light of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt (see, People v Pagan, 45 N.Y.2d 725; People v Eley, 121 A.D.2d 462). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.