From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-03300

Submitted November 13, 2001

December 3, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), rendered March 27, 2000, convicting him of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Charles M. Newell, Quogue, N.Y., for appellant.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (John J. Ribeiro of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LEO F. McGINITY, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620) we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Perez, 208 A.D.2d 867; People v. Lewis, 162 A.D.2d 760, 764). Moreover, the defendant's request for an expanded charge was properly denied.

McGINITY, J.P., LUCIANO, FEUERSTEIN and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. CHARLES STEWART, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 857

Citing Cases

People v. Toussaint

Although Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 (2) requires proof that the defendant knew or had cause to know "that…