From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stevens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2008
48 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-09318.

February 13, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated August 28, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's contention that the assessment of points against him based upon the victim's physical helplessness constituted improper "double counting" because he was also assessed points based upon the victim's age is without merit ( see People v Davenport, 38 AD3d 634; People v Vaughn, 26 AD3d 776).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Stevens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2008
48 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD L. STEVENS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1319
849 N.Y.S.2d 893

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly assessed points for both the age of the victim…

People v. Ologbonjaiye

377–379, 960 N.Y.S.2d 719, 984 N.E.2d 917). The defendant was also properly assessed points under risk factor…