From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stevens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 24, 2020
186 A.D.3d 1833 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

110285

09-24-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Melinda A. STEVENS, Appellant.

Dana L. Salazar, East Greenbush, for appellant. Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.


Dana L. Salazar, East Greenbush, for appellant.

Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Clark, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered January 23, 2018, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal contempt in the second degree, attempted aggravated family offense and obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal contempt in the second degree, attempted aggravated family offense and obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and waived the right to appeal. During the plea colloquy, County Court informed defendant that, if she pleaded guilty, it could sentence her to up to 365 days in jail or to probation for up to three years, or it could impose a fine of not greater than $1,000 for each count. Following her guilty plea, County Court sentenced defendant to three concurrent sentences of 365 days in jail and imposed a $1,000 fine. Defendant appeals, arguing that County Court's imposition of both a 365–day jail sentence and a fine violated the terms of the plea agreement.

Defendant's contention survives her appeal waiver, inasmuch as the record reveals that the waiver explicitly excluded a contention that County Court violated its sentencing agreement (see People v. Sausville, 112 A.D.3d 984, 985, 975 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2013], lv denied 22 N.Y.3d 1159, 984 N.Y.S.2d 643, 7 N.E.3d 1131 [2014] ; see also People v. Sanchez, 164 A.D.3d 1545, 1547, 84 N.Y.S.3d 589 [2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 1115, 91 N.Y.S.3d 366, 115 N.E.3d 638 [2018] ). The People concede, and we agree, that a sentence that included both 365 days in jail and an imposition of a fine was not part of the plea agreement. Defendant has served her jail time and we find that the provision of her sentence imposing the fine must be vacated (see People v. Anderson, 99 A.D.3d 1034, 1035, 952 N.Y.S.2d 305 [2012], lv denied 20 N.Y.3d 1009, 960 N.Y.S.2d 352, 984 N.E.2d 327 [2013] ; People v. Cote, 265 A.D.2d 681, 682, 697 N.Y.S.2d 184 [1999] ; People v. Youngs, 156 A.D.2d 885, 886, 550 N.Y.S.2d 106 [1989] ).

Clark, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating that portion of the sentence as imposed a $1,000 fine, and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Stevens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 24, 2020
186 A.D.3d 1833 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Melinda A. Stevens…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 24, 2020

Citations

186 A.D.3d 1833 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
186 A.D.3d 1833
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 5093

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

Although defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review by failing to object to the imposition of…

People v. Wilson

Although defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review by failing to object to the imposition of…