From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stauffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 4, 1998

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion in sentencing him as a persistent felony offender is without merit ( see, Penal Law § 70.10; People v. Bowers, 201 A.D.2d 830, 831, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 909). Further, in light of defendant's extensive history of alcohol related offenses and flagrant disregard for the consequences of driving in an intoxicated condition, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, People v. Turner, 234 A.D.2d 704, 707). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.)


Summaries of

People v. Stauffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1998
247 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Stauffer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN W. STAUFFER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 532

Citing Cases

People v. Mercado

In addition, there is no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant was not too intoxicated to form the…