Opinion
2011-11-22
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kenley STANISLAS, appellant.
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Benjamin Barczewski on the brief), for respondent.
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Benjamin Barczewski on the brief), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), rendered March 29, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made because the Supreme Court failed to specifically enumerate certain of his constitutional rights is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing ( see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Reyes, 41 A.D.3d 620, 836 N.Y.S.2d 418; People v. Watson, 19 A.D.3d 518, 798 N.Y.S.2d 471; People v. Maddy, 110 A.D.2d 719, 488 N.Y.S.2d 33), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.