From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stamps

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 18, 2020
188 A.D.3d 1105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2019–02140 Ind.No. 18–00360

11-18-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bryan STAMPS, appellant.

Clinton W. Calhoun III, White Plains, NY, for appellant. Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Jordan K. Hummel and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.


Clinton W. Calhoun III, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Jordan K. Hummel and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

When a defendant pleads guilty to a crime, he or she generally must move to withdraw the plea or otherwise object to its entry prior to the imposition of sentence to preserve a challenge to the validity of the plea for appellate review (see People v. Williams, 27 N.Y.3d 212, 214, 32 N.Y.S.3d 17, 51 N.E.3d 528 ; People v. Conceicao, 26 N.Y.3d 375, 382, 23 N.Y.S.3d 124, 44 N.E.3d 199 ). The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was invalid is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not move to vacate his plea prior to the imposition of sentence or otherwise raise the issue in the Supreme Court (see People v. Palladino, 140 A.D.3d 1194, 33 N.Y.S.3d 469 ; People v. Karadag, 181 A.D.3d 620, 117 N.Y.S.3d 590 ; People v. Murphy, 135 A.D.3d 881, 881, 22 N.Y.S.3d 892 ). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contentions, the record affirmatively demonstrates the defendant's understanding and waiver of certain constitutional rights, and the entry of a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent plea of guilty (see People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 19–20, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170 ; People v. Sirico, 135 A.D.3d 19, 22, 18 N.Y.S.3d 430 ; People v. Isaiah S., 130 A.D.3d 1081, 13 N.Y.S.3d 840 ).

Contrary to the defendant's further contention, he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with the negotiation of his plea (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 ; People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404, 633 N.Y.S.2d 270, 657 N.E.2d 265 ; People v. Richards, 186 A.D.3d 1411, 128 N.Y.S.3d 871 [2d Dept.] ; People v. Penaranda, 178 A.D.3d 858, 111 N.Y.S.3d 553 ).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Stamps

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 18, 2020
188 A.D.3d 1105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Stamps

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Bryan Stamps…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2020

Citations

188 A.D.3d 1105 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
188 A.D.3d 1105
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6815

Citing Cases

People v. Maldonado

Since this issue would survive a valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Jenkins, 165 AD3d 1167,…

People v. Coverdale

Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (seePeople v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).…