From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spirito

Court of Appeals of New York
May 21, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 2766 (N.Y. 2024)

Opinion

No. 53

05-21-2024

The People & c., Respondent, v. Dominic F. Spirito, Appellant.

John A. Cirando, for appellant. Cheryl Mancini, for respondent.


John A. Cirando, for appellant.

Cheryl Mancini, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As a condition of his parole, defendant agreed not to "own, possess, or purchase" any firearm without permission from his parole officer. Defendant was given "the most severe" mental health designation from the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, OMH Level 1-S, indicating there were "serious" concerns regarding his mental health. Shortly after defendant's release to parole, his parole officer received information from his supervisor that defendant's mother contacted the parole office to inform them that she saw a photograph of defendant with a firearm, and gave the parole officers permission to search the residence that she shared with defendant . Acting on this information, defendant's parole officer, with the assistance of other officers, conducted a search of defendant's home and recovered an AR-15 style rifle and two thirty-round extended magazines with extra gun parts from defendant's bedroom.

The People do not rely on the mother's permission for the search of defendant's residence.

Based on the foregoing, there is record support for the lower courts' conclusion (see 216 A.D.3d 1208 [3d Dept 2023]) that the search of defendant's residence by defendant's parole officer was "rationally and reasonably related to the performance of the parole officer's duty" and so defendant's motion to suppress this evidence was properly denied (People v Huntley, 43 N.Y.2d 175, 181 [1977]). The Aguilar-Spinelli test (see Aguilar v State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108 [1964]; Spinelli v United States, 393 U.S. 410 [1969]) for evaluating whether a tip provides police with probable cause for a search or seizure does not apply in these circumstances (see generally Huntley, 43 N.Y.2d at 181).

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Singas, Cannataro, Troutman and Halligan concur.


Summaries of

People v. Spirito

Court of Appeals of New York
May 21, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 2766 (N.Y. 2024)
Case details for

People v. Spirito

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Dominic F. Spirito, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: May 21, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 2766 (N.Y. 2024)