From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1996
228 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 13, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Andrias, J.).


Defendant's claim that his plea was not entered voluntarily is unpreserved for appellate review since, upon reconsideration and consultation with counsel, defendant abandoned his motion to withdraw the plea ( see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725). In any event, the record clearly establishes the voluntariness of the plea and that an opportunity had been given to defendant to address the court prior to the imposition of sentence. Defendant was not denied his right to be present since neither of the two bench conferences from which he was absent "presented the potential for his meaningful participation" ( People v Rodriguez, 85 N.Y.2d 586, 591).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Sosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1996
228 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Sosa

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID SOSA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 344