From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Snell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 15, 1994

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Marks, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The stipulation prepared following this Court's remittal (People v. Snell, 203 A.D.2d 933) reveals that defendant was neither present at a Sandoval conference nor at a Ventimiglia hearing. The stipulation further reveals that County Court ruled, in defendant's absence, that the People could cross-examine defendant about a prior felony conviction if he testified. Moreover, the court's Ventimiglia ruling was not favorable to defendant (see, People v. Snell, supra). Because defendant was not present at material stages of his trial, reversal is required (see, People v. Favor, 82 N.Y.2d 254; People v. Spotford, 196 A.D.2d 179).


Summaries of

People v. Snell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Snell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROY SNELL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 296