From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 8, 2016
499 Mich. 898 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151663. COA No. 316224.

04-08-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Robert Anthony SMITH, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motions to add issue and to supplement are GRANTED. The motion to remand and the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay and the motion for guidance are DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 8, 2016
499 Mich. 898 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Robert Anthony…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Apr 8, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 898 (Mich. 2016)
876 N.W.2d 825

Citing Cases

Smith v. Jackson

The Michigan Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, remanded the matter to the trial judge to…

Smith v. Jackson

Id. Petitioner then filed an application for leave to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court. See People v.…