From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smart

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 29, 2017
29 N.Y.3d 1098 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

06-29-2017

The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. Andrew SMART, Appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, Appellate Advocates, New York City (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn (Jill Oziemblewski of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, Appellate Advocates, New York City (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn (Jill Oziemblewski of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record supports the Appellate Division's finding that the challenged lineup was not unduly suggestive. Accordingly, defendant's claim is beyond our further review ( People v. McBride, 14 N.Y.3d 440, 448, 902 N.Y.S.2d 830, 928 N.E.2d 1027 [2010] [citation omitted] ).

Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges RIVERA, STEIN, FAHEY, GARCIA and WILSON concur. Judge FEINMAN took no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Smart

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 29, 2017
29 N.Y.3d 1098 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Smart

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. Andrew SMART, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jun 29, 2017

Citations

29 N.Y.3d 1098 (N.Y. 2017)
58 N.Y.S.3d 896
81 N.E.3d 379

Citing Cases

Smart v. Lamanna

The Court of Appeals affirmed, by memorandum, the Appellate Division's order. People v. Smart, 81 N.E.3d 379…

People v. Wilson

The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the judgment, holding that "the People adduced legally sufficient…