Opinion
December 22, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the plea allocution's sufficiency (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). Moreover, were we to review this issue in the interest of justice, reversal would not be warranted. The record indicates that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).
Defense counsel's apparent argument that the factual recitation of the underlying crime might have been insufficient is without merit (see, People v. Riley, 120 A.D.2d 752; People v. Dixon, 119 A.D.2d 831). Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.