Opinion
February 21, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mastro, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record fails to substantiate the defendant's contention that his confession was involuntarily obtained by virtue of the arresting detective's interrogation methods (see, People v Tarsia, 50 N.Y.2d 1, 11-12; People v. Smith, 208 A.D.2d 966; People v. Ingram, 208 A.D.2d 561; People v. Foster, 193 A.D.2d 692, 693; People v. Hassell, 180 A.D.2d 819, 820; People v. Jackson, 140 A.D.2d 458). Miller, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.