From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Slade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2001
283 A.D.2d 155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

May 1, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J.), rendered May 29, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert W. Gifford, for Respondent.

Moira E. Casey, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner, Buckley, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The jury properly rejected defendant's agency defense (see, People v. Lam Lek Chong, 45 N.Y.2d 64, 74-75, cert denied 439 935). "The evidence established that defendant acted primarily, if not exclusively, for his own advantage, particularly since there was no evidence that defendant had any other reason to risk arrest by assisting a total stranger in purchasing drugs." (People v. Elvy, A.D.2d 717 N.Y.S.2d 247).

There was no Rosario violation concerning a chemist's notes. Since that chemist did not testify, the undisclosed notes were not Rosario material, and did not become Rosario material vicariously when another chemist tested the drugs and testified (see, People v. Ford, 211 A.D.2d 438).

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motions based on various comments by the prosecutor during her opening statement and summation. With respect to objections that were sustained, the court's curative instructions were sufficient to prevent any prejudice (see, People v. Santiago, 52 N.Y.2d 865). The other summation remarks challenged by defendant on appeal constituted fair comment on the evidence in response to defense arguments (see, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976).

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Slade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2001
283 A.D.2d 155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Slade

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT v. ROY SLADE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 588