From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Slack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 7, 1991
177 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 7, 1991

Appeal from the County Court of Otsego County (Mogavero, Jr., J.).


Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that his waiver of his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea bargain was knowingly and voluntarily made and that defendant fully understood the consequences of the waiver (see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1; People v. Brown, 160 A.D.2d 1039). Furthermore, a review of the minutes of the plea allocution indicates that County Court made sufficient inquiry of defendant, who was aided by competent counsel, and that defendant fully comprehended the nature of the proceedings and knowingly entered his plea. Accordingly, the court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v Lattmen, 101 A.D.2d 662, 663; People v. Walton, 98 A.D.2d 842, 843). We have examined defendant's remaining contention and find it lacking in merit.

Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Mikoll, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

People v. Slack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 7, 1991
177 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Slack

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL T. SLACK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Torres

We affirm. Initially, we find no abuse of discretion in County Court's determination denying defendant's…

People v. Sosa

Although defendant points out that his first language is not English, a Spanish interpreter was present at…