From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Skerry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1994
205 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 6, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court properly determined that the police conduct did not violate the defendant's constitutional right to be free of unlawful searches and seizures (People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181; People v. Cruz, 169 A.D.2d 836; People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234).

We have examined the defendant's remaining arguments concerning the plea allocution and the court's Sandoval ruling, and find that they are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Johnson, 141 A.D.2d 848). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Skerry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1994
205 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Skerry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS A. SKERRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 270