From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Singleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1985
109 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 4, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agresta, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The victim of this incident died eight days later from a subdural hematoma and lacerations and contusions of the brain. Unlike People v. Stewart ( 40 N.Y.2d 692), there is no evidence of any intervening event which could have caused the subdural hematoma. Consequently, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury's finding that the death resulted from traumatic head injuries sustained at the time that the defendant took the victim's purse ( People v. Kibbe, 35 N.Y.2d 407).

Although the prosecutor made certain improper comments during summation, any prejudicial effect was dispelled by the court's prompt curative instructions and admonitions to the prosecutor ( People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396).

Defendant's other contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Gibbons, J.P., Weinstein, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Singleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1985
109 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Singleton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN KIRK SINGLETON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Vargas

We find unpersuasive the defendant's contention that he was denied a fair trial due to five remarks made by…

People v. Singleton

July 6, 2004. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…