From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1984
99 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

January 30, 1984


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), rendered December 1, 1982, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the second degree, reckless driving and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. In this case, defendant led police on a high-speed chase through three towns, ran two roadblocks, ignored numerous directions to pull over, and drove at a police officer who was attempting to apprehend him. Such conduct clearly falls within the ambit of section 205.30 Penal of the Penal Law irrespective of the fact that defendant did not resist after subsequently crashing a barricade and being shot (see People v Stevenson, 31 N.Y.2d 108; People v Simms, 36 A.D.2d 23; People v Lattanzio, 35 A.D.2d 313). Nor is there any merit to the contention that the trial court should have charged that the police officers were interested witnesses as a matter of law (1 PJI [2d ed] 90-92). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1984
99 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HOPETON SIMPSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

If the allegations in the supporting depositions are true, it is readily apparent that the Defendant closed…

People v. Williams, 2009 NY Slip Op 50844(U) (N.Y. Dist. Ct. 5/4/2009)

If the allegations in the supporting depositions are true, it is readily apparent that the Defendant closed…