From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1991
178 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 9, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant asserts that the trial court erred when it instructed the jury that a trial is a search for the truth. This contention is not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05; People v Whalen, 59 N.Y.2d 273; People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818). In any event, the court's instructions, viewed in their entirety, adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standards applicable to this case (see, People v Graziano, 151 A.D.2d 775; see also, People v Coleman, 70 N.Y.2d 817, 819; People v Adams, 69 N.Y.2d 805, 806; People v Goodfriend, 64 N.Y.2d 695, 697). Accordingly, the defendant's contention is without merit.

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit (see, People v Sterling, 151 A.D.2d 522). Harwood, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1991
178 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERVAN SIMPSON, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Toribio

05; People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621; People v. Cadorette, 56 N.Y.2d 1007, 1009). In any event, when…

People v. Slacks

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that reversible error took place by the court's references to…