From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1993
196 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

September 20, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion to withdraw his pleas (see, People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926; People v Taveras, 169 A.D.2d 743).

We further conclude that since the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel appears to rest on matters dehors the record, the proper way to have raised the claim was by a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 and not by direct appeal.

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05) or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Simon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1993
196 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Simon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE SIMON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 20, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 29

Citing Cases

People v. Martin

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. To the extent that the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of…

People v. Heffelfinger

Since it is apparent that the defendant failed to cooperate, he was not entitled to withdrawal of his plea of…