From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simmons

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 3, 2014
113 A.D.3d 1081 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-01-3

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jacquetta B. SIMMONS, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered November 14, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree. Ann M. Nichols, Buffalo, for Defendant–Appellant. Lawrence Friedman, District Attorney, Batavia (William G. Zickl of Counsel), for Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered November 14, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree.
Ann M. Nichols, Buffalo, for Defendant–Appellant. Lawrence Friedman, District Attorney, Batavia (William G. Zickl of Counsel), for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

On appeal from a judgment convicting her following a jury trial of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[12] ), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We reject that contention. “Viewing the evidence in a neutral light and weighing the probative value of the conflicting testimony and the conflicting inferences that could be drawn, while deferring to the jurors' ability to observe the witnesses and assess their credibility, aided by the video recording, we find that it was not contrary to the weight of the credible evidence for the jury to find that defendant” intentionally punched the victim (People v. Purvis, 90 A.D.3d 1339, 1341, 935 N.Y.S.2d 212, lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 997, 945 N.Y.S.2d 651, 968 N.E.2d 1007; see e.g. People v. Woodring, 48 A.D.3d 1273, 1275, 850 N.Y.S.2d 809, lv. denied10 N.Y.3d 846, 859 N.Y.S.2d 404, 889 N.E.2d 91; People v. Gibbs, 34 A.D.3d 1120, 1121–1122, 824 N.Y.S.2d 502; People v. Thomas, 24 A.D.3d 1242, 1243, 806 N.Y.S.2d 831, lv. denied6 N.Y.3d 819, 812 N.Y.S.2d 458, 845 N.E.2d 1289; see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672).

We agree with defendant, however, that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe under the circumstances of this case, and we therefore modify the judgment by reducing the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice to a definite term of imprisonment of one year ( see generallyCPL 470.15[6][b] ).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and conclude that it lacks merit.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the sentence to a definite term of imprisonment of one year and as modified the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to Genesee County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5). SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, and VALENTINO, JJ., concur.

All concur except Sconiers, J., who dissents and votes to reverse in accordance with the following Memorandum:

I respectfully dissent because, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), in my view the verdict convicting defendant of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[12] ) is against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). I would therefore reverse the judgment of conviction and dismiss the indictment. Where, as here, a different finding from that reached by the jury would not have been unreasonable, we must “ ‘weigh the relative probative force of conflicting testimony and the relative strength of conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the testimony’ ” ( id.), and then we must “decide[ ] whether the jury was justified in finding the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” (Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d at 348, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1; see People v. Lamar, 83 A.D.3d 1546, 1546–1547, 921 N.Y.S.2d 757). When considering all of the evidence in the record, including the surveillance video, I conclude that the credible evidence is more consistent with the testimony of the defense witnesses that defendant's arm was grabbed by someone who was behind her and that she accidently struck the victim when she aggressively pulled away from that person's grasp.


Summaries of

People v. Simmons

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 3, 2014
113 A.D.3d 1081 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jacquetta B. SIMMONS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 3, 2014

Citations

113 A.D.3d 1081 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
113 A.D.3d 1081
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 12

Citing Cases

People v. Merrow

Even assuming, arguendo, that a different verdict would not have been unreasonable, we conclude that, viewing…

People v. Merrow

Even assuming, arguendo, that a different verdict would not have been unreasonable, we conclude that, viewing…