From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Siders

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 2, 2014
123 A.D.3d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

13626 2860/11

12-02-2014

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth Siders, Defendant-Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Richard Joselson of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Dana Poole of counsel), for respondent-appellant.


, Acosta, Saxe, Clark, Kapnick, JJ.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Richard Joselson of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Dana Poole of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered January 3, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal mischief in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 9 months, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court should have inquired into whether his guilty plea was coerced by the court's denial of a bail reduction, and we find that his challenge to the plea does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Peque, 22 NY3d 168, 182 [2013]; see also People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725 [1995]. We decline to review the challenge in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and the mere fact that defendant initially rejected the People's plea offer but changed his mind immediately after the court denied the bail application did not require any additional inquiry. Defendant does not contend that the denial of his bail application was improper or unwarranted by the circumstances (compare People v Sung Min, 249 AD2d 130, 132 [1st Dept 1998]). Furthermore, defendant was already incarcerated in lieu of bail, and there is no indication that simply maintaining the same bail conditions was being used to unduly persuade defendant to plead guilty (compare People v Grant, 61 AD3d 177, 184 [2d Dept 2009]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 2, 2014

CLERK


Summaries of

People v. Siders

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 2, 2014
123 A.D.3d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Siders

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth Siders…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 2, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8365
996 N.Y.S.2d 279

Citing Cases

People v. Widgins

Judgments of conviction (Diana M. Boyar, J.), rendered January 15, 2014 and January 16, 2014, affirmed.Since…

People v. Widgins

Since defendant did not move to withdraw his guilty plea or vacate the judgments, and since this case does…