From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shay

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

872 KA 14-00324

07-02-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy A. SHAY, Defendant–Appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Alan Williams of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Joseph V. Cardone, District Attorney, Albion (Katherine Bogan of Counsel), for Respondent.


The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Alan Williams of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.

Joseph V. Cardone, District Attorney, Albion (Katherine Bogan of Counsel), for Respondent.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child (Penal Law § 263.11 ) and two counts of sexual abuse in the second degree (§ 130.60 [2] ). We note at the outset that, as the People correctly concede, defendant did not waive his right to appeal. “[A]lthough a waiver of the right to appeal was initially mentioned during a discussion of the elements of the plea agreement, County Court failed to elicit the waiver from defendant during the plea colloquy” (People v. Crane, 294 A.D.2d 867, 867, 740 N.Y.S.2d 916, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 767, 752 N.Y.S.2d 7, 781 N.E.2d 919 ).

We reject defendant's contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. We agree with defendant, however, and the People again correctly concede, that the court erred in directing that the definite sentences imposed on the misdemeanor counts shall run consecutively to the indeterminate sentence imposed on the felony count (see Penal Law § 70.35 ). We therefore modify the judgment by directing that the definite sentences shall run concurrently with the indeterminate sentence (see People v. Leabo, 84 N.Y.2d 952, 953, 620 N.Y.S.2d 820, 644 N.E.2d 1376 ; People v. Shorter, 6 A.D.3d 1204, 1205–1206, 775 N.Y.S.2d 712, lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 648, 782 N.Y.S.2d 419, 816 N.E.2d 209 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by directing that the definite sentences shall run concurrently with the indeterminate sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, WHALEN, and DeJOSEPH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Shay

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Shay

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy A. SHAY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 2, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 1499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5847
12 N.Y.S.3d 926

Citing Cases

People v. Little

We reject defendant's contention that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. However, inasmuch as we cannot…

People v. Favors

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the…