From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Seymour

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 16, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2019–01729 Ind.No. 3365/18

12-16-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Brian SEYMOUR, Appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Diane R. Eisner, and Michael Bierce of counsel), for respondent.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Diane R. Eisner, and Michael Bierce of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deborah Dowling, J.), rendered November 29, 2018, convicting him of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the sentence imposed violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 5 of the New York Constitution prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Pena, 28 N.Y.3d 727, 730, 49 N.Y.S.3d 342, 71 N.E.3d 930 ), and, in any event, without merit (see People v. Rolling, 186 A.D.3d 1264, 1264, 127 N.Y.S.3d 874 ).

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid because both the oral colloquy and the written waiver executed by the defendant suggest that the waiver encompasses an absolute bar to the taking of a direct appeal (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 545, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 ; People v. Howard, 183 A.D.3d 640, 640, 121 N.Y.S.3d 622 ). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude this Court from reviewing the issue of whether the defendant's sentence is excessive (see People v. Fuller, 163 A.D.3d 715, 715, 76 N.Y.S.3d 852 ). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY, LASALLE, and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Seymour

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 16, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Seymour

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Brian Seymour…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 1269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
134 N.Y.S.3d 211
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7597

Citing Cases

People v. Small

The record reflects that the County Court made its own offer of sentence to the defendant and required the…

People v. Small

The record reflects that the County Court made its own offer of sentence to the defendant and required the…