From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1991
174 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 11, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford Scott, J.).


The Sandoval ruling, limiting inquiry as to whether defendant had been convicted of a felony, did not result in undue prejudice to defendant (see, People v Ricks, 135 A.D.2d 844, 845, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 895, 74 N.Y.2d 746). We note that the prosecutor, in fact, did not elicit this testimony, and did not refer to it in summation. The prosecutor's summation, was reasoned response to that of the defendant.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1991
174 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MORRIS SCOTT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
571 N.Y.S.2d 214

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

( See, People v Lucas, 160 A.D.2d 330, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 860.) We note that the court minimized its…