From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Scott

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2017
65 N.Y.S.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2015–03222 (Ind.No. 9592/09)

12-27-2017

The People, etc., respondent, v. Melissa Scott, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Richard Joselson of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan A. Popolow of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Richard Joselson of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan A. Popolow of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J. WILLIAM F. MASTRO SHERI S. ROMAN HECTOR D. LASALLE LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed April 7, 2014, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Walsh, J.), upon a finding that she violated conditions thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a definite term of one year of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of assault in the second degree, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the amended sentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the term of imprisonment from one year to 364 days.

Although the defendant has served her amended sentence, the question of whether the amended sentence imposed should be reduced is not academic, because the one-year term may have potential immigration consequences (see People v. Ayala, 142 AD3d 1095; People v. Aisewomhonio, 131 AD3d 1177 ). Considering all of the relevant circumstances of this case, including the potential immigration consequences to the defendant, we conclude that her amended sentence should be reduced by one day (see People v. Williams, 137 AD3d 429; People v. Aisewomhonio, 131 AD3d 1177 ; People v. Weston, 98 AD3d 1066 ; People v. Bakare, 280 A.D.2d 679 ; People v. Cuaran, 261 A.D.2d 169 ).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, ROMAN, LASALLE and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

People v. Scott

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2017
65 N.Y.S.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:The People, etc., respondent, v. Melissa Scott, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 27, 2017

Citations

65 N.Y.S.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Citing Cases

People v. Bakayoko

Thus, the appeal waiver does not preclude review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim.Although the…

People v. Janvier

Further, our dissenting colleagues, who would reduce the defendant's sentence by one day to enable him to…